| Author | Comment |
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(1/17/2005 2:14:09 AM)
|  Do you feel a draft?
Be expecting one. There is no way Baby Bushcorp can sustain his forever war of terror without one. Actually even with one he and his handlers are doomed to fail.
Here is a good link, there are others.
http://davidicke.com/icke/no-draft/nodraft.html
How to not be forced into involuntary servitude in the military should be posted far and wide across this land. If we really care about freedom, it starts here at home by keeping our children alive first. Remember, one of the main goals of the Illuminutty is world population control, i.e. population reduction. This time around they are not going after just men but women as well. They have to kill as many or more fertile child bearing age females as males to cause a population decline.
Read this stuff and spread the word, copy it and post in schools and everywhere else young people gather. The child you save just might be your own...
Allen
|
Swedishoo
Admin
Posts: 690
(1/17/2005 8:30:05 AM)
| Icke
Good link Al. I think I spent nearly an hour over there and still didn't make a dent in the reading material. Lots of great stuff. I like the idea of our youth being informed.Good idea.
Christy
|
Psiquest
Posts: 28
(9/5/2005 7:13:40 AM)
| Re: Icke
The military is far surpassing it's recruiting efforts...The only people who suggested a draft were DemocRat senators.
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/5/2005 2:58:13 PM)
| Re: Re: Icke
Suure they are. That's why they had to send NG units to Iraq you twit, to make up the shortfall in numbers.
Allen
|
Psiquest
Posts: 28
(9/6/2005 2:25:35 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Icke
That's not very nice calling me a twit Al.
The reason they are sending units back to Iraq is because it takes alot of time to train the newer recruits and they need experienced people in there now. This does not mean that they are not meeting their reqruiting objectives. In fact, they have far surpassed them. People take more time to train now because the jobs are more specialized and higher tech...It's not like the cannon fodder we used to send to war. War is not fought by sheer numbers of grunts with guns anymore...It is fought by highly trained people...That training takes time, even IF recruitment objectives are met.
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/6/2005 2:33:05 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Psiquest wrote on 9/5/2005 8:25:35 PM:
That's not very nice calling me a twit Al.
The reason they are sending units back to Iraq is because it takes alot of time to train the newer recruits and they need experienced people in there now. This does not mean that they are not meeting their reqruiting objectives. In fact, they have far surpassed them. People take more time to train now because the jobs are more specialized and higher tech...It's not like the cannon fodder we used to send to war. War is not fought by sheer numbers of grunts with guns anymore...It is fought by highly trained people...That training takes time, even IF recruitment objectives are met. |
You aren't a very nice person. You're an idiot and a liar as well.
I didn't say anything about sending units back to Iraq- I said the National Guard was deployed there to make up the shortfall in regular forces, that is true. They can't get, and don't have, enough "bodies" to fill the boots.
Allen
|
Psiquest
Posts: 28
(9/6/2005 2:37:43 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Correction...I am an extremely nice person..
And the point is that they don't just need bodies to fill the boots anymore..They need highly trained bodies. Training takes time, even if the recruitment objectives are met. This is why there is no need for the draft. Draft or no draft, it's not going to solve the training problem. Our difficulty now is the direct result of our military being depleted by Klintoon....We are still in the process of rebuilding it.
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/6/2005 2:52:08 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Psiquest wrote on 9/5/2005 8:37:43 PM:
Correction...I am an extremely nice person..
And the point is that they don't just need bodies to fill the boots anymore..They need highly trained bodies. Training takes time, even if the recruitment objectives are met. This is why there is no need for the draft. Draft or no draft, it's not going to solve the training problem. Our difficulty now is the direct result of our military being depleted by Klintoon....We are still in the process of rebuilding it. |
Correction, no you're not, you are a hacker and a criminal.
Why aren't you in uniform right now, in Iraq?
I'll dig up the Army recruiter # for you.
The training BS is BS and that is all.
Allen
|
Psiquest
Posts: 28
(9/6/2005 2:54:01 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Why aren't you in uniform right now, in Iraq?
Why aren't you?
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/6/2005 2:57:30 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Psiquest wrote on 9/5/2005 8:54:01 PM:
Why aren't you in uniform right now, in Iraq?
Why aren't you? |
Why would I be stupid enough to fight against people who had done me no wrong?
Sorry Cyster, you failed yet again.
Allen
|
Psiquest
Posts: 28
(9/6/2005 2:59:33 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
So you only fight against people who have done you wrong Al? So I take it, the people who attacked us on 9/11 have done you no wrong?
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/6/2005 3:06:13 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Psiquest wrote on 9/5/2005 8:59:33 PM:
| So you only fight against people who have done you wrong Al? So I take it, the people who attacked us on 9/11 have done you no wrong? |
Don't try sophistry with me Junior. You haven't learned much about me in 6 or so years now, have you? I am still waiting for the answer as to why you are here all of a sudden when Bushcorp is in the tank and you were banned from this site? Ball to your court Junior.
Allen
|
Psiquest
Posts: 28
(9/6/2005 3:07:52 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
What's Bushcorp? And what would Bushcorp in the tank have to do with my posting on message boards?
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/6/2005 3:27:54 AM)
|  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Lame.
Allen
|
Psiquest
Posts: 28
(9/6/2005 3:31:07 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Allen at 5 wrote on 9/5/2005 8:27:54 PM:
Allen, you shouldn't call yourself lame like that. Positive self esteme is important, so I suggest you not be so hard on yourself.
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/6/2005 3:32:42 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Psiquest wrote on 9/5/2005 9:31:07 PM:
Allen at 5 wrote on 9/5/2005 8:27:54 PM:
Allen, you shouldn't call yourself lame like that. Positive self esteme is important, so I suggest you not be so hard on yourself. |
Grow up Cy.
Allen
|
Psiquest
Posts: 28
(9/6/2005 3:44:01 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Make up your mind...Are you asking Cy or Allen to grow up?
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/6/2005 11:42:32 PM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Adios again Cy. I wonder if there is such a thing as electronic Lysol so I can flush the stench you exude every time you pop in out of my computer???
Allen
|
msu94
Posts: 13
(9/8/2005 9:35:34 PM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Cy is in your head, Allen. Tin foil beanies ain't gonna help you now.
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/8/2005 9:55:17 PM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
msu94 wrote on 9/8/2005 3:35:34 PM:
| Cy is in your head, Allen. Tin foil beanies ain't gonna help you now. |
Now THAT is juvenile. And you expect anyone to take you seriously here?
Allen
|
msu94
Posts: 13
(9/8/2005 10:31:52 PM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Typical of chemmie paranoia.
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/8/2005 10:38:34 PM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
msu94 wrote on 9/8/2005 4:31:52 PM:
| Typical of chemmie paranoia. |
Exactly my thought in your case.
Allen
|
msu94
Posts: 13
(9/8/2005 11:02:32 PM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
Except I am niether a chemmie, nor am I paranoid.
|
Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(9/8/2005 11:39:15 PM)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Icke
msu94 wrote on 9/8/2005 5:02:32 PM:
| Except I am niether a chemmie, nor am I paranoid. |
I have no idea what a "chemmie" is. You accused me of "typical chemmie paranoia" when I said you were being juvenile with your post (and you were). One of the standard diagnostic tests for mental illness is a tendency to see one's own sickness in others. YOU are the one who showed up and called Gar a kook and started slinging the "tinfoil hat" and "paranoid chemmie" nonsense around. I'd suggest you'd best clean up your own house and act first.
Allen
|
