| Author | Comment | gar fla
Posts: 148
(1/9/2005 4:09:22 AM)
| Hi Christy
I hadn't seen you on Mav's board since that last post you made with "This Board Sucks". I noticed the less than kind replies you received. I've about given up on that board myself. Cy is a saint compared to Stuart Assholesop. There's no way I can believe he's an adult after all that childish behavior he demonstrated with me. I picture him as just a teenage geek on Ritalin who takes out his frustrations on others through the comfort of the web because he's probably been bullied himself. If he is over 18, I really feel sorry for him. I noticed how he became even more frustrated because I refused to lower myself to his level. I don't mind at all posting on a board of mainly debunkers but some of those folks are just sick in the head and it gets depressing after a while. At least some people such as Deb and Shawn seem to be nice. Anyway, I hope you're ok and, if you can, let me know your thoughts on Stuart and some of these other "winners" over there. I guess it's kind of funny when you really think about it.
| Allen at 5
Posts: 313
(1/9/2005 3:40:31 PM)
|  The boards
I've never been there myself, not going either. After the experience I had with Jaybird Reynoldswrap over at Seeker's, plus too much of Cy in the past I pretty much quit. This is the only place I feel comfortable.
I have seen this happen at other boards too, that have nothing to do with unusual phenomenon. One of the rudest, most asinine nazi-like encounters I had in cyberspace was with an individual that also used [believe it or not] a board devoted to C/L model airplanes. This clown was in the Texas ANG at the same time Dubya was and was a Lt. Col. He is supposed to be one of the officers who investigated Dubya's service record in the guard [back then] and found no wrongdoing. Hee yuk, hee yuk. I think I still have the last e-mail this slopehead sent me, if I can find it I will post it here you folks need to read it for a real hoot.
Allen
| Swedishoo
Admin
Posts: 690
(1/10/2005 8:09:25 AM)
| Re: Hi Christy
Hi guys. Yeah Stuart is a piece of work. He has raging rightous tantrums. I think it's funny as hell. Sometimes I mess with him just to see how big of a tantrum he'll have. Personaly, I think I upset him more than anyone. A long time ago now, Gregg asked me to help him monitor his board and I've always liked Gregg, so I did. But I felt I had to bite my tounge a lot because Gregg's board is pro-Bush, but thankfully, they weren't radicals or anything like Mav's board. I haven't been typing over there much because I've been really busy...and about to get busier, but I had to pop in with the Flight Explorer thing. Deb is so full of shit...She doesn't know me yet she'll put words in my mouth? She's really stupid. BTW, look what I found in her files. I helped myself. :-) http://cdebsjournal.topcities.com/GarChristy.htm Is that creepy or what? The irony here is she has this listed back in 2001 but this is the same conversation we just had AND it wasn't me that said anything about the "4:30 express" it was MSU and ChickieDeb. I think she currently edited her info, because she didn't know that I lived 25 miles NW of you, before now.
Al, do you remember that rediculous argument Cy and I had over the "if and then" logic? And of course Cy played dumb. Well, that's what these guys do over at Mav's. They play logic debate games...and I'll be honest, I wouldn't have known what they were up to if I hadn't taken Logic in college. They are truly annoying. One time is fine, but anything after that is nothing but a headache. Well the latest "game" that Stuart is/was trying to play on Gar is that since Gar did not prove him wrong, then he wins the debate, regardless. LOL. And I've got to quote this...it's too funny....
Lexta says about the Stuart and Gar debate: "You obviously don't know what it means to debunk. Debunking also means defending your position. If Stuart says 1=1+2 and you say 1+1=3, you haven't debunked Stuart. You've made a claim. When your claim is reviewed it will be found to be invalid so Stuart's original assertion stands. If you don't defend your assertion then Stuart wins by default. Which is exactly what has happened here. Stuart made an assertion, you made an incorrect assertion, your incorrect assertion was debunked, and you remain unwilling to defend your assertions. Stuart has won because he is right and because you refuse to defend your position."
So, Stuart's 1+2=1 is correct, because Gar didn't disprove it. LOLOLOLOLOL
They play all kinds of mental games...which is not a part of real debate at all. They play fallacy games...ie strawman, redherring, etc etc.
excuse any typos it's late and I'm not going to spellcheck
Christy
| gar fla
Posts: 148
(1/10/2005 2:27:22 PM)
| Re: Re: Hi Christy
Hey, I do remember that conversation with Deb from way back on your earlier board. But a page devoted to us? Interesting. That "4:30 Express" is a term that Lo the Seektress (lol) used. Jay did a piece to debunk Lo's claim and he even put her picture in it. I'm not making any comments about that.
| Swedishoo
Admin
Posts: 690
(1/11/2005 12:09:15 AM)
| Re: Re: Re: Hi Christy
We may have talked about it before but she never knew our location until now. I think she added that in. And if you browse around her directory, 99 percent of her captured images from FE are humidity charts. I remember, that's the one thing I could never figure out...how to capture a live screen. Mark tried to teach me how but I could never get it...it wasn't like snagging pictures from the net.
| |
