Chemtrail and Company IV
... Political Agendas and the News

...... Bush's latest misuse of words
Login | Register Page 1
Author Comment
gar fla


Posts: 148
(8/6/2004 12:18:19 AM)



 Bush's latest misuse of words


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5613296/
Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(8/6/2004 5:41:36 AM)




 Re: Bush's latest misuse of words
LOLOL

WASHINGTON - President Bush offered up a new entry for his catalog of “Bushisms” on Thursday, declaring that his administration will “never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people.”

LOL. That's for sure!


gar fla


Posts: 148
(8/6/2004 2:49:54 PM)



 Re: Re: Bush's latest misuse of words
I only found out about this at the MSNBC web site. If this was ever mentioned on the tv news, I didn't hear it anyway. This should be headline news because it's not just some minor slip up.

Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(8/7/2004 10:56:19 PM)




 Kennebunkport seems like a SAFE place to be

Kennebunkport seems like a SAFE place to be! Chrsity



KENNEBUNKPORT, Maine (Reuters) - President Bush warned Americans on Saturday last weekend's terrorism alert was another sign the country was still not safe but said he was taking steps to prevent future attacks.

Alert levels were raised for specific locations in New York City, Washington and New Jersey after a top-level review of information that al Qaeda may be plotting to attack financial institutions including the New York Stock Exchange, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.

"We're doing everything we can in our power to confront the danger," Bush said in his weekly radio address. "We're making good progress in protecting our people and bringing our enemies to account."

The administration has been facing tough questions after it became known that some of the information that led to the elevated alert was three years old.

Bush defended the new alerts, stating new information gleaned from arrests in Pakistan and other new intelligence suggested that al Qaeda had recently updated information on those potential targets.

"We're still not safe," said Bush, who was spending the weekend at his family's oceanfront compound in Maine to attend the wedding of his nephew, George P. Bush, the son of Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. He also found time to do some fishing with his twin daughters and father, former President George Bush.

"We'll keep our focus, we'll keep our resolve, and we will do our duty to best secure our country," he said.


gar fla


Posts: 148
(8/8/2004 3:09:34 AM)



 Re: Kennebunkport seems like a SAFE place to be
When are the sheep going to put 2+2 together? We're told about how serious this latest terrorist threat is and what does Bush do? Go on vacation. On Sept. 11, Bush is informed that our nation is under attack. What does he do? Stay in a classroom for 7 minutes. After being so much against the thought of the 9/11 Commission, Bush now kisses their ass and says how important it is that we follow their recommendations. However, we'll just have to wait until October. That's when congress comes back from VACATION.

Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(8/8/2004 3:13:35 AM)




 Re: Re: Kennebunkport seems like a SAFE place to be
I know! Isn't it a joke?!!

Time to wipe the slate clean!!

Let em go on vaca 24/7

Christy
Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(8/8/2004 9:11:47 AM)




 Those Darn Terrorist !


Allen at 5


Posts: 313
(8/8/2004 5:32:44 PM)



 Re: Those Darn Terrorist !
Go re-read "1984". That is because the State and the "Terrorists" are one in the same and Bush Baby just told ALL of you that- and it wasn't a slip; it was an in your face "inside joke" by the Illuminutty. Allen
Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(8/8/2004 11:47:37 PM)




 1984
“Who controls the past controls the future;
who controls the present controls the past.”


George Orwell

Allen at 5


Posts: 313
(8/9/2004 5:14:07 AM)



 Re: 1984
Swedishoo wrote on 8/8/2004 5:47:37 PM:
“Who controls the past controls the future;
who controls the present controls the past.”


George Orwell

"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything". Stalin The future controls totally "the past". It cannot be any other way- if "the future" didn't already exist in some form then things like precognition would be impossible. However, it is by no means a straight and easy road in clear daylight. "Always in motion is the future, difficult to see". Yoda Allen
Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(8/9/2004 9:24:00 PM)




 Re: Re: 1984
Ahhh yes, Wise Master. Reminds me in 1984, how they would change the past's information to conform the minds of the present. Sorta like how we do now.  Try to find a history book that teaches the children about what the Civil War was really about...and in the future, try to find a history book that tells the children what the Iraq war was really about.

Hense, the future controls the past.

Christy
gar fla


Posts: 148
(8/10/2004 3:52:53 AM)



 Re: Re: Re: 1984
Hey, speaking of the year 1984. Wasn't that during the time when Saddam was a "buddy" of the USA? Yes, strange how convenient it is to ignore history when it's hypocrisy contradicts a current agenda. Humm, isn't there another infamous person who also followed the same pattern? As long as the sheeple are kept busy with such things as their Playstations and violent movies, it doesn't matter.

Allen at 5


Posts: 313
(8/15/2004 8:14:33 PM)



 Re: Re: Re: Re: 1984
gar fla wrote on 8/9/2004 9:52:53 PM:
Hey, speaking of the year 1984. Wasn't that during the time when Saddam was a "buddy" of the USA? Yes, strange how convenient it is to ignore history when it's hypocrisy contradicts a current agenda. Humm, isn't there another infamous person who also followed the same pattern? As long as the sheeple are kept busy with such things as their Playstations and violent movies, it doesn't matter.

Yes. Saddam was a USSA "asset" when it suited "our" agenda. He counterbalanced the Iranians. Just like Manuel Noreaga in Panama- once he is no longer of use: SHAZZAM! he becomes the bad guy who needs to be destroyed. It is ALL a farce and a lie of the first rank and order. George Orwell originally titled his work "1948" (the year he finished it) intending to show thereby as an "inside joke" that the totalitarian system he wrote about was already in place and operating. His publisher was "uncomfortable" with that title and changed it to "1984"... Allen
Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(8/15/2004 9:59:00 PM)




 Malibu George

Speaking of Bush and his vacations, here's a picture of Bush assessing the damage that hurricane Charley created. Notice how GW looks like a Ken doll.

My, look at those white hands where the golf glove covers.


Allen at 5


Posts: 313
(8/16/2004 12:37:45 AM)



 Re: Malibu George
"I have personally viewed and assessed the damage here at the local golf course and can say I am going to see that no Federal efforts are spared in rebuilding it". G.W. Bush. It has always interested me that Scotland has given us two of the most worthless things on the planet: golf and Scottish Rite Freemasonry... Allen
gar fla


Posts: 148
(8/16/2004 2:54:28 AM)



 Re: Bush's reaction to disaster
He seems to have that same look on his face as when he'd been given the news on 9/11 that America was under attack. How comforting.

gar fla


Posts: 148
(8/16/2004 4:24:57 AM)



 Re: Re: Bush's reaction to disaster
Just picture his reaction to a REAL disaster.




"Mr. President, I'm sorry to inform you that rain has cancelled all of your 18 holes for today."

gar fla


Posts: 148
(8/16/2004 1:52:37 PM)



 Re: Re: Re: Bush's reaction to disaster

While on tour of the ruins, a woman ran up to president Bush and screamed that she just can't believe what Charley has done. Bush said Don't worry. We're gonna catch this guy.
Allen at 5


Posts: 313
(8/17/2004 3:17:54 AM)



 Re: Re: Re: Re: Bush's reaction to disaster
gar fla wrote on 8/16/2004 7:52:37 AM:

While on tour of the ruins, a woman ran up to president Bush and screamed that she just can't believe what Charley has done. Bush said Don't worry. We're gonna catch this guy.

"By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes". All this might be just in humor, but I can assure you all that Dubya is NOT. He WILL BE the next US "Prez" without question. He and Kerry are "blood of the same blood" and that calls to each of them in their own way. The outcome of the "election" will only favor the Illuminutty, no matter which "side" is "chosen". Choose Pepsi or Coke, you still get only different "flavors" of the exact same cola... Allen
Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(8/17/2004 7:26:35 AM)




 Bush
LOLOL

Damn, you guys could go on the road! LOLOLOL


On a serious note... I started a new thread titled Shock and Awe

Christy


Swedishoo
Admin

Posts: 690
(9/4/2004 12:33:35 AM)




 Cheney ~ We Cannot Wait for the Next Attack!!


"Even in this post-9/11 period, Senator Kerry doesn't appear to understand how the world has changed. He talks about leading a "more sensitive war on terror," as though Al Qaeda will be impressed with our softer side. He declared at the Democratic Convention that he will forcefully defend America after we have been attacked. My fellow Americans, we have already been attacked, and faced with an enemy who seeks the deadliest of weapons to use against us, we cannot wait for the next attack. We must do everything we can to prevent it and that includes the use of military force."

Dick Cheney, 2004 Republican Convention


Cheney can't wait for the next attack.
He's so excited about it bet he's wetting himself.

Okay, okay you're saying to yourself...Cheney doesn't mean goody goody, I can't wait. Dicky boy means that we can't wait around for the next attack and that we have to prevent it. My question: WHAT next attack?

Either way you look at this, its sinister.
"we cannot wait for the next attack"
Slip of the tounge? Who knows? But he looks pretty happy about it.

Christy

Allen at 5


Posts: 313
(9/4/2004 4:02:20 PM)



 Re: Cheney ~ We Cannot Wait for the Next Attack!!
ALL this BS is drawn straight from "1984" with the "Terrorists" standing in for Immanuel Goldstein. I always thought it was interesting that Orwell picked a "Jewish" name for the master villian in his book. It is like the phony "terror alerts"- if you (the goobernemnt) have enough intelligence to claim that certain parties are plotting a "terrorist attack", yet you don't know who they are, where they are or how they plan to attack (just vagure target areas), then something is seriously wrong. The only possible explanations are either you are completely incompetent, or the entire thing is a hoax and all evidence indicates the latter is the case. It is little wonder that even most American sheeple pay no attention at all to these alerts now. Allen